(PS) Rhee v. Alvarez, No. 2:2018cv00105 - Document 82 (E.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/01/23 ADOPTING 81 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 74 Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSING action. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HANNA Q. RHEE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-00105-DAD-DMC (PS) v. ALEXANDRA M. ALVAREZ, et al., 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 74, 81) 16 17 Plaintiff Hanna Q. Rhee, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on January 17, 2018. 18 (Doc. No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 19 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 16, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 20 21 recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint (Doc. No. 22 74) be granted and that this action be dismissed without leave to amend because granting plaintiff 23 further leave to amend would be futile. (Doc. No. 81.) The findings and recommendations were 24 served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within 25 fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 11.) To date, no objections to the findings and 26 recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 3 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly: 5 1. 6 The findings and recommendations issued on June 16, 2023 (Doc. No. 81) are adopted in full; 7 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 74) is granted; 8 3. This action is dismissed; and 9 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 1, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.