(PC) Thornberry v. Chau et al, No. 2:2018cv00094 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/12/2018 ADOPTING 9 findings and recommendations in full. Claims against defendants Chau, Smith, and Bobbala are DISMISSED as duplicative. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0094-WBS-EFB P v. ORDER JAMES CHAU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2018, are adopted in full; and 27 28 ///// 1 1 2. Claims against defendants Chau, Smith, and Bobbala are dismissed as duplicative. 2 3 Dated: June 12, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
