(HC) Rosiles v. Pfeiffer, No. 2:2017cv02600 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/29/18 GRANTING 21 Motion for Extension. Petitioner is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file any objections to 20 Findings and Recommendations.(Coll, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Rosiles v. Pfeiffer Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK RENE ROSILES, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-02600-KJM-GGH ORDER v. C. PFEIFFER, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus on December 12, 2017, ECF No.1 in 18 pro se, but has failed to complete an application for in forma pauperis status. On October 1, 2018 19 this court filed Findings and Recommendations recommending that petitioner’s petition for a writ 20 be dismissed with prejudice and directed that any objections thereto were to be filed within 21 21 days after service of the Order. ECF No. 20. On October 24, 2018 petitioner filed a motion for a 22 30 day extension of time to file objections. ECF No. 21. 23 24 The court has examined the petitioner’s motion and finding good cause therefore HEREBY ORDERS as follows: 25 26 27 1. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations filed on October 1, 2018. //// 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Any failure to timely file such objections shall result in no consideration thereof. 2 3. This Order resolves ECF Nos. 20 and 21. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 DATED: October 29, 2018 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
