(HC) Dupree v. Muniz, No. 2:2017cv02543 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/17/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. assigned to this case. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Fabillaran, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Dupree v. Muniz Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE ANTONIO DUPREE, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-2543 AC P v. ORDER and W. MUNIZ, Warden, 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, filed December 4, 2017. On December 7, 2017, this court 19 informed petitioner that, in order to proceed with this action, he must pay the $5.00 filing fee or 20 submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis that is approved by the court. See 21 ECF No. 3. Petitioner was provided thirty days, or until January 8, 2018, to comply with the 22 court’s order. Petitioner was informed that failure to comply with this deadline would result in a 23 recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 1. The court’s deadline has passed but 24 petitioner has not complied with the court’s order or otherwise communicated with the court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a 25 26 district judge to this case; and 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days after 4 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 5 the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 6 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 7 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 8 Cir. 1991). 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 17, 2018 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
