(PS) Ruz v. Sessions et al, No. 2:2017cv02483 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/19/2018 GRANTING 6 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have until 7/6/2018 to file objections to 5 Findings and Recommendations. (York, M)
Download PDF
(PS) Ruz v. Sessions et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLORIA RUZ, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-2483 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se. The matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). On November 27, 2017, plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint and paying 21 the required filing fee. ECF No. 1. An initial scheduling conference was set for May 23, 2018 22 before the undersigned. ECF No. 3. However, parties failed to submit their status reports 23 fourteen days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 240(b). Moreover, plaintiff failed to 24 show proof that defendants had been served with the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 25 (“Rule”) 5(d). Accordingly, the Court issued an order vacating the hearing and ordering plaintiff 26 to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. 27 Plaintiff did not respond. On June 5, 2018, the undersigned recommended that this action be 28 dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court’s order and granted 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 plaintiff twenty-one days to file objections. ECF No. 5. On June 14, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to respond to the Court’s 3 order to show cause. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff explains she needs additional time to respond and that 4 the motion is not intended to cause delay. Id. at 1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time is 5 construed as an extension of time to file objections to the undersigned’s June 5, 2018 findings and 6 recommendations. 7 Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY OREDERED that plaintiff’s motion 8 for extension of time, ECF No. 6, is GRANTED, and plaintiff shall have until July 6, 2018 to file 9 objections. 10 DATED: June 19, 2018 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2