(HC) Bagley v. Ndoh, No. 2:2017cv02213 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/16/2020 ADOPTING 20 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 15 Motion to Stay. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES RAY BAGLEY, JR., 12 Petitioner, 13 v. No. 2:17-cv-2213 MCE DB P ORDER 14 ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 20. Petitioner 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 29, 2020 (ECF No. 20), are ADOPTED in full; 1 2. Petitioner’s motion to stay (ECF No. 15) is DENIED; and 2 3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: March 16, 2020 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
