(PC) Jones v. Fox, et al., No. 2:2017cv02190 - Document 42 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/25/2018 ADOPTING 32 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 30 & 31 motions for injunctive relief are DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jones v. Fox, et al. Doc. 42 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KEVIN JONES, 6 7 8 No. 2:17-cv-2190-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER FOX, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On May 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 15 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 16 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 17 the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2018, are adopted in full; and 22 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 20, 21, 22, 24, 30 & 31) are denied. 23 24 25 26 DATED: June 25, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
