(PC) Evans v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, No. 2:2017cv01890 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/6/19 ADOPTING in full 17 findings and recommendations and DENYING 16 Motion to Reopen Case. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ANTHONY EVANS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1890 WBS DB P v. ORDER CALIF. DEP’T CORRS. & REHAB., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 7, 2019 (ECF No. 17) are adopted in 3 4 5 full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this case (ECF No. 16) is denied. Dated: August 6, 2019 6 7 8 9 10 DLB:9/evan1890.804 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
