(PS) Powell v. Powell, No. 2:2017cv01751 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/3/2017 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 are ADOPTED in FULL; this action is summarily REMANDED to Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento; and the Clerk of Court shall close this case. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Powell v. Powell Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL THOMAS POWELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. Defendant. 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER T. ARTIMES POWELL, 15 17 No. 2:17-cv-01751-TLN-CKD Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On August 31, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to all party that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. //// //// //// //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 31, 2017 are adopted in full; 3 2. This action is summarily REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of 4 5 Sacramento; and 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. 6 7 Dated: October 3, 2017 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
