(PC) Williams-Turner v. Moghaddam et al, No. 2:2017cv01481 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/2/2018 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the filing fee within 14 days. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Williams-Turner v. Moghaddam et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LONNIE M. WILLIAMS-TURNER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1481-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER MOGHADDAM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 16, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 16, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; and 4 3. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the filing fee within fourteen days of the date of this order. 5 Failure to comply will result in dismissal of this action. 6 7 8 9 DATED: July 2, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.