(PC) Campos-Rodriguez v. Dagostini et al, No. 2:2017cv01448 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/11/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAMPOS-RODRIGUEZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1448 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAGOSTINI, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Plaintiff alleges defendants violated his right of access to the court by failing to provide him with 19 adequate law library facilities. (ECF No. 1.) 20 On July 2, 2018, the court screened and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 11.) 21 Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within thirty days and warned that failure to 22 do so may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Thereafter, plaintiff did not 23 file an amended complaint. 24 By order dated August 16, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to dismiss this action or file an 25 amended complaint within fourteen days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was again warned that failure 26 to comply with the court’s order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 27 Those fourteen days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, notified the 28 court he wishes to dismiss the action, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 7 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 8 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 9 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: September 11, 2018 11 12 13 14 15 16 DLB:12 DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner.Civil.Rights/camp1448.fsc 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.