(PC) Wilkins v. Baughman et al, No. 2:2017cv01368 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/16/18 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 14 motion to stay this action pending his appeal of Judge Mueller's order be denied; and this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Wilkins v. Baughman et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEENAN W. WILKINS, 12 No. 2:17-cv-1368 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 19, 2018, the Honorable Troy L. Nunley revoked plaintiff’s 19 in forma pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 20 17.) Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee. Accordingly, the undersigned 21 recommends that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has also requested that this action be stayed pending his appeal of Judge 22 23 Mueller’s order in 2:16-cv-347 KJM KJN P directing plaintiff to pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 24 14.) Court records indicate that the Ninth Circuit dismissed plaintiff’s appeal of Judge Mueller’s 25 order for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. (See 16-cv-347; ECF No. 70.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s 26 motion to stay this action pending his appeal of Judge Mueller’s order should be denied. 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s motion to stay this action pending his appeal of Judge Mueller’s order (ECF 3 No. 14) be denied; 4 2. This action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 7 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 10 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 11 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 12 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 13 Dated: November 16, 2018 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wilk1368.dis 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
