(PC) Wilkins v. Baughman et al, No. 2:2017cv01368 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/17/18 ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED, and Plaintiff is ordered to pay the filing fee of $400 for this action within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Wilkins v. Baughman et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEENAN W. WILKINS, 12 No. 2:17-cv-1368-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 22, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 22, 2018, are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED, and Plaintiff is ordered to pay the 4 filing fee of $400 for this action within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. 5 Dated: September 17, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.