(PS) Ransom v. Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency et al, No. 2:2017cv01366 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/23/18, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Ransom v. Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLINTON RANSOM, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-01366 TLN AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO HOUSING REDEVELOPING AGENCY, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On February 13, 19 2018, the court dismissed the complaint, and granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended 20 complaint. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a 21 recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. On March 21, 2018 the 22 undersigned issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to 23 prosecute. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff has not respond to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 24 prosecute this case. 25 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 26 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 27 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 5 Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Failure to file objections within the 6 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 7 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: April 23, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
