(PS)Draper v. Google Corporation et al, No. 2:2017cv01299 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/20/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(York, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS)Draper v. Google Corporation et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN LEE DRAPER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-01299 KJM AC PS v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOOGLE CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 19 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 15, 2017, 20 the court dismissed the complaint, and granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. 21 ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the 22 action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 23 prosecute this case. Moreover, the order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 24 25 service on two different occasions. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s 26 Local Rules, which require that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any 27 address change within sixty-three days. Local Rule 183(b). More than sixty-three days have 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify 2 the Court of a current address. 3 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 4 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 5 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110, 183(b). 6 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 7 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 8 (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 9 objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 10 Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 11 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 12 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 13 DATED: November 20, 2017. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
