(PC)Thornberry v. Kernan et al, No. 2:2017cv00953 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/29/18. Plaintiff's 10 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Thornberry v. Kernan et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-00953-TLN-CMK P v. ORDER J. BAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District 19 of California local rules. 20 On March 8, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which 21 were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a 22 specified time. (ECF No. 15.) No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2018 (ECF No. 15), are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 10) is denied. Dated: March 29, 2018 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
