(PC) Carroll v. Spearman, No. 2:2017cv00862 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/18/18 adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's request to consolidate 20 is denied. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Carroll v. Spearman Doc. 23 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 TREYMAYNE DEON CARROLL, 6 7 8 No. 2:17-cv-0862 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SPEARMAN, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 12 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 13 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On June 8, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 15 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 16 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 17 the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 22 23 24 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 8, 2018 (ECF No. 22), are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s request to consolidate (ECF No. 20) is denied. DATED: July 18, 2018 25 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE _____ 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
