(PC) Reed v. Racklin, et al., No. 2:2017cv00799 - Document 44 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/28/2019 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations issued 9/30/2019 (ECF No. 42 ) in full; GRANTING Defendant Racklin's motion for summary judgment, filed 1/28/2019 (ECF No. 38 ); the screening order dated 6/12/2017 (ECF No. 7 ) is construed as findings and recommendations for the dismissal of all other defendants and is ADOPTED, and this case is CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PETER J. REED, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0799 WBS AC P v. ORDER E. RACKLIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 17 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 30, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 42. Plaintiff 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 43. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued September 30, 2019 (ECF No. 42) are 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendant Racklin’s motion for summary judgment, filed January 28, 2019 (ECF No. 38), is GRANTED; 3. The screening order dated June 12, 2017 (ECF No. 7) is construed as findings and recommendations for the dismissal of all other defendants and is ADOPTED, and 4. This case is CLOSED. Dated: October 28, 2019 10 11 12 13 14 15 reed0799.805 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
