(PS)Bochene v. MFRA Trust 2014-2, MF Residential Accets, LLC, et al, No. 2:2017cv00768 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/5/2018 ADOPTING IN FULL 30 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 18 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING the claims against Defendant Capital One Bank without leave to amend; DISMISSING Capital One Bank from this action. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
(PS)Bochene v. MFRA Trust 2014-2, MF Residential Accets, LLC, et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY BOCHENE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-00768-TLN-DB PS v. ORDER MFRA TRUST 2014-2, MFRESIDENTIALASSETS, LLC AS ADMINISTRATOR, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 18 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 24, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 23 recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the 24 findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2018 (ECF No. 30), are adopted 3 4 5 6 7 8 in full; 2. Defendant Capital One Bank’s June 29, 2017 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 18) is granted; 3. The complaint’s claims against Defendant Capital One Bank are dismissed without leave to amend; and 4. Defendant Capital One Bank is dismissed from this action. 9 10 Dated: March 5, 2018 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.