Ixchel Pharma, LLC. v. Biogen Inc., No. 2:2017cv00715 - Document 50 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: STIPULATION AND FINAL JUDGMENT signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/9/18 dated *2/12/18* in favor of Biogen Inc. against Ixchel Pharma, LLC.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF

Ixchel Pharma, LLC. v. Biogen Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 50 Mark S. Popofsky (CSB #175476) ROPES & GRAY LLP 2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006-6807 mark.popofsky@ropesgray.com (202) 508-4600 Christopher D. Banys (CSB #230038) Richard C. Lin (CSB #209233) Jennifer L. Gilbert (CSB #255820) BANYS, P.C. 1030 Duane Avenue Santa Clara, CA 95054 cdb@banyspc.com rcl@banyspc.com jlg@banyspc.com (650) 308-8505 Rocky C. Tsai (CSB #221452) ROPES & GRAY LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4006 rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com (415) 315-6300 Attorneys for Plaintiff, IXCHEL PHARMA, LLC 8 Attorneys for Defendant, BIOGEN INC. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 Case No. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB 15 16 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IXCHEL PHARMA, LLC, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 v. BIOGEN INC., Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION Plaintiff Ixchel Pharma, LLC (“Ixchel”) and Defendant Biogen Inc. (“Biogen”), through their undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and agree that: WHEREAS, on January 25, 2018, the Court issued its Order granting Biogen’s motion to dismiss as to all claims in the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 48) (“Dismissal Order”); 28 STIP. RE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT -1- CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB Dockets.Justia.com 1 WHEREAS, in its Dismissal Order, the Court held that any further amendment as to 2 Ixchel’s first, second, third, and fourth claims would be futile, but granted Ixchel an opportunity 3 to file a Third Amended Complaint to amend its fifth claim against Biogen under California 4 Unfair Competition Law if it could do so consistent with the Dismissal Order; 5 6 7 WHEREAS, Ixchel will not be filing a Third Amended Complaint, but Ixchel intends to pursue an appeal of the Dismissal Order; WHEREAS, in light of the above, Ixchel and Biogen agree that final judgment should be 8 entered against Ixchel and in favor of Biogen as to all claims in the Second Amended 9 Complaint, with Ixchel reserving its right to appeal. 10 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 11 1. The Court enter a final judgment against Ixchel and in favor of Biogen as to all 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 claims asserted by Ixchel in the Second Amended Complaint. 2. For avoidance of doubt, Ixchel agrees to entry of final judgment because of the adverse rulings of the Court, and it expressly reserves its right to appeal the final judgment and all the orders and decisions in this case that are appealable. 3. The initial scheduling conference on February 26, 2018, and the deadline for the parties to file an amended joint status report on February 12, 2018, are hereby vacated and taken off calendar. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT -2- CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB 1 SO STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY: 2 3 Dated: February 7, 2018 /s/ Christopher D. Banys________ 4 Christopher D. Banys (CSB #230038) Richard C. Lin (CSB #209233) Jennifer L. Gilbert (CSB #255820) BANYS, P.C. 1032 Elwell Court, Suite 100 Palo Alto, CA 94303 cdb@banyspc.com rcl@banyspc.com jlg@banyspc.com (650) 308-8505 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff, IXCHEL PHARMA, LLC 12 13 14 Dated: February 7, 2018 15 /s/ Rocky C. Tsai______________ Rocky C. Tsai (CSB #221452) ROPES & GRAY LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4006 rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com (415) 315-6300 16 17 18 Mark S. Popofsky (CSB #175476) ROPES & GRAY LLP 2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006-6807 mark.popofsky@ropesgray.com (202) 508-4600 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Defendant, BIOGEN INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT -3- CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB 1 ORDER RE ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 Dated: February 9, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT -4- CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically through 3 the Court’s CM/ECF system on February 7, 2018 in compliance with L.R. 133. Therefore, this 4 document was served on the following counsel for Defendant who are deemed to have 5 consented to electronic service: 6 7 8 9 Mark S. Popofsky ROPES & GRAY LLP 2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006-6807 mark.popofsky@ropesgray.com (202) 508-4600 10 11 12 13 14 Rocky C. Tsai ROPES & GRAY LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4006 rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com (415) 315-6300 15 /s/ Tiffany Dang Tiffany Dang 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT -5- CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00715-WBS-EFB

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.