(HC) Robben v. Dagostini, No. 2:2017cv00532 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/11/2017 ORDERING petitioner's surreply will be considered when this court issues its findings and recommendations on the pending 15 motion to dismiss. Petitioner shall file no further do cuments, motions, or notices in this court until the pending motion to dismiss has been resolved through an order of the court. The Clerk shall refrain from filing any such pre-resolution documents, if such are filed in violation of this order, and shall only note them on the court's docket as having been received. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(HC) Robben v. Dagostini Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TODD ROBBEN, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-00532-WBS-GGH Petitioner, v. ORDER JOHN DAGOSTINI, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, acting in pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this habeas matter regarding 18 alleged constitutional violations of rights right while he is incarcerated pending trial in the 19 Superior Court of Sacramento. ECF No. 1. On July 17, 2017 Respondent, through the El Dorado 20 County District Attorney, filed a motion to dismiss the petition, ECF No. 15, to which petitioner 21 filed opposition on August 7, 2017, ECF No. 22, which he supplemented on August 14, 2017, 22 ECF No. 26. Responded filed a reply memorandum on August 24, 2017, ECF No. 33, after 23 which the dismissal motion was deemed submitted for decision. 24 In the interim petitioner has filed a request for subpoena, ECF No. 28, a motion for bail, 25 ECF No. 30, which was denied on August 30, 2017, ECF No. 37, a request to file a surreply, ECF 26 No. 38, a notice of a fraudulent claim and order for payment of fees by his trial counsel, ECF No. 27 39 filed September 5, 2017, a notice that he has filed with the California Supreme Court and a 28 petition for a writ of mandate to disqualify the trial judge in his case filed on September 5, 2017. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 ECF No. 40. 2 All of this post-motion to dismiss activity diverts the court’s attention from the resolution 3 of that motion which is under submission. In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Petitioner’s surreply will be considered when this court issues its Findings and Recommendations on the pending motion; 2. Petitioner shall file no further documents, motions, or notices in this court until the pending motion to dismiss has been resolved through an order of the court; 3. The Clerk shall refrain from filing any such pre-resolution documents, if such are filed in violation of this order, and shall only note them on the court’s docket as having been received. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.