(PS) Sharp v. Elk Grove Unified School District, No. 2:2017cv00490 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/17/2018 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
(PS) Sharp v. Elk Grove Unified School District Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALYSTA SHARP, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-490-TLN-EFB PS v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. 16 17 On January 10, 2018, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend.1 The 18 19 order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended 20 complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended 21 complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 10. The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 22 23 responded to the order. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 28 1 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 7 and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right 8 to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); 9 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: April 17, 2018. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.