(PC)Peck v. Hopkins et al, No. 2:2017cv00430 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 09/28/17 DISMISSING Plaintiff's Claims VI and VII with prejudice. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Peck v. Hopkins et al Doc. 26 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ROY AUBURN PECK, III, 7 8 9 No. 2:17-cv-0430 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HOPKINS, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 13, 2017, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s Claims VI and VII are dismissed without prejudice. DATED: September 28, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez__________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
