(PC)Wright v. Hansan et al, No. 2:2017cv00260 - Document 66 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/17/21 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and for failure to comply with the court's local rules. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
(PC)Wright v. Hansan et al Doc. 66 Case 2:17-cv-00260-KJM-JDP Document 66 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL WEBSTER WRIGHT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 J. LEWIS, et al., 15 16 Case No. 2:17-cv-00260-KJM-JDP (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 19 On November 10, 2020, defendants filed a motion for terminating sanctions pursuant to 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A). ECF No. 61. In violation of Local Rule 230(l), 21 plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion. 22 Accordingly, on December 18, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within twenty-one days 23 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the 24 court’s local rules. ECF No. 65. He was also ordered to file, within twenty-one days, a response 25 to defendants’ motion to defendants’ motion. Id. at 2. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply 26 with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. To 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:17-cv-00260-KJM-JDP Document 66 Filed 02/17/21 Page 2 of 2 1 date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion, 2 nor otherwise responded to the court’s December 18, 2020 order. 3 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: 4 1. This action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, 5 and for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. See ECF No. 65. 6 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. 7 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 8 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 9 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 10 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 11 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 12 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 13 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 14 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 15 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: 18 19 February 17, 2021 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2