(PC)Gray v. CSP-Sacramento et al, No. 2:2017cv00213 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/6/19 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full; All claims against defendant CSP-Sacramento are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARDOS GRAY, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0213 WBS AC P v. ORDER CSP-SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 15, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 27 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 1 1 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 2 ORDERED that: 3 4 5 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 15, 2019 (ECF No. 8), are adopted in full; and 2. All claims against defendant CSP-Sacramento are dismissed without leave to amend. Dated: September 6, 2019 7 8 9 10 11 Gray0213.800 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
