Lee v. City of Sacramento, No. 2:2017cv00118 - Document 84 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/21 ADOPTING 83 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 68 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lee v. City of Sacramento Doc. 84 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IVAN S. LEE, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-118-JAM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On March 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 21 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 22 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 23 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 19, 2021, are ADOPTED; 24 25 and 2. Defendant’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 68) is denied. 26 27 28 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
