(PC) Owens v. Matthews et al, No. 2:2016cv02750 - Document 165 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/21/2020 ADOPTING 155 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 138 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PC) Owens v. Matthews et al Doc. 165 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 THEON OWENS, 5 6 7 No. 2: 16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSEPH DEGAZIO, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 11 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 13 On February 21, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 14 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 15 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff was re-served 16 with the findings and recommendations at his current address on February 26, 2020. Neither 17 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 21, 2020, are adopted in full; 22 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 138) is denied as moot. 23 24 25 26 DATED: April 21, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.