(PC) Tunstall v. Bodenhamer, et al., No. 2:2016cv02665 - Document 63 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 03/19/18 DENYING 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 26 plaintiff's motions and requests for injunctive relief. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF

(PC) Tunstall v. Bodenhamer, et al. Doc. 63 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, Jr., 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 No. 2:16-cv-2665 JAM DB P v. ORDER D. BODENHAMER, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 11 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 13 On August 17, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 30) 14 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 15 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 16 objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 34.) 17 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has 18 conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds 19 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 20 //// 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions and requests for 22 injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 26) are denied. 23 DATED: March 19, 2018 24 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.