(PS) Yegorov v. Owens et al, No. 2:2016cv02576 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/26/17 RECOMMENDING that that this action be dismissed without prejudice; referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Yegorov v. Owens et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DMITRIY YEGOROV, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:16-cv-2576 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. RONALD OWENS, PLACER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Defendant. 17 18 By order filed April 11, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was 19 granted leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight 20 days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has 21 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 22 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14) 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 27 objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to 28 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal 2 the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: May 26, 2017 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB/orders/orders.pro se/yegorov2576.fta.f&rs 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.