(PC) Blackshire v. Sacramento County Sheriff, No. 2:2016cv02537 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/18/2018 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED and the Clerk is directed to VACATE the 16 Order and 17 Judgment and REOPEN the case. The Clerk is directed to re-serve plaintiff with a copy of the court's 15 screening order. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Blackshire v. Sacramento County Sheriff Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK BLACKSHIRE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:16-cv-2537-MCE-EFB P ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 1, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2018, are adopted in full. 28 2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 18) is granted and the Clerk is 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 directed to vacate the September 13, 2017 order (ECF No. 16) and judgment (ECF No. 2 17) and reopen the case. 3 4 5 3. The Clerk is directed to re-serve plaintiff with a copy of the court’s August 2, 2017 screening order (ECF No. 15). 4. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint 6 curing the deficiencies identified in the magistrate judge’s August 2, 2017 screening order and is 7 warned that failure to do so may result in a recommendation of dismissal. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 18, 2018 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
