(PC) Hicks v. Arya, No. 2:2016cv02465 - Document 68 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 63 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/10/18. Plaintiff's 61 motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Hicks v. Arya Doc. 68 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL J. HICKS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2465-TLN-KJN P v. ORDER AFSHIN ARYA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 08, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 08, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 61) is DENIED. 4 5 Dated: September 10, 2018 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
