(PS) City of Sacramento v. Altstatt, No. 2:2016cv02449 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 01/18/17 ORDERING that this matter is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:16-cv-2449 GEB DB PS ORDER DANIEL J. ALTSTATT, 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to 17 18 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On November 30, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the 22 findings and recommendations. Defendant has filed objections to the findings and 23 recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 30, 2016 (ECF No. 9) are adopted 28 in full; 1 1 2. This matter is summarily remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court; and 2 3. This case is closed. 3 Dated: January 18, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 /sacramento2449.jo 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
