(PC) Sutton v. Giessner, et al., No. 2:2016cv02369 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/14/2018 WITHDRAWING the 7 findings and recommendations and the Clerk shall request plaintiff's Certified Prison Trust account statement from the CDCR. Upon receipt of the statement, the court will address plaintiff's ifp application. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Sutton v. Giessner, et al. Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KARIMI SUTTON, 11 12 13 No. 2:16-cv-2369-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. GIESSNER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 23, 2018, the court recommended that this case be dismissed after 18 plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. On 19 March 12, 2018, plaintiff filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the February 23, 2018 findings and 21 recommendations (ECF No. 7) are withdrawn and the Clerk is directed to request plaintiff’s 22 Certified Prison Trust account statement from the California Department of Corrections and 23 Rehabilitation. Upon receipt of the statement, the court will address plaintiff’s application for 24 leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 25 Dated: March 14, 2018. 26 27 28 1 He also stated that his friend had paid the $400 filing fee, but this is not reflected on the court’s docket. ECF No. 8. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
