(PC) Moore v. Tesluk et al, No. 2:2016cv02268 - Document 74 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 56 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 2/13/18. Plaintiff's 53 motion for a court order, construed as a motion for injunctive relief, is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN MOORE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2268 GEB KJN P v. ORDER G. TESLUK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 29, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2017, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order (ECF No. 53), construed as a motion for injunctive 4 relief, is denied. 5 Dated: February 13, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.