(PC) Merriman v. Telander et al, No. 2:2016cv02030 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2017 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 18 Motion to Dismiss. (York, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Merriman v. Telander et al Doc. 25 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 DOMINIQUE MERRIMAN, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 No. 2:16-cv-2030-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER JAMES TELANDER, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On September 5, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 15 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 16 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 17 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 5, 2017, are adopted in full; and 21 22 23 24 ///// 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 18) is denied. DATED: 12/19/2017 25 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
