(PC) Fordley v. Lizarraga et al, No. 2:2016cv01985 - Document 72 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 68 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 04/17/18 DENYING with prejudice 48 Motion for TRO (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Fordley v. Lizarraga et al Doc. 72 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN FREDERICK FORDLEY, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1985-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 14, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 68. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 14, 2018 (ECF No. 68), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 2. Plaintiff’s December 4, 2017 motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 48) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 17, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
