(HC) Gibbs v. Shasta County, No. 2:2016cv01958 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/30/2016 ORDERING that the 13 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Petitioner's 10 motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(b), is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Gibbs v. Shasta County Doc. 14 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ROBERT ALAN GIBBS, 6 7 8 No. 2:16-cv-1958 JAM GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY, 9 Respondent. 10 11 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 12 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 13 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On October 27, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 15 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 16 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 13. Petitioner 17 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2016, are adopted in full; and 22 2. Petitioner’s filing, (ECF No. 10), construed as a motion for relief from judgment 23 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(b), is denied. 24 DATED: November 30, 2016 25 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
