(PC) Valenzuela v. CSP Sacramento et al, No. 2:2016cv01814 - Document 43 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/06/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court assign a district judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANTOS VALENZUELA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. No. 2:16-cv-1814 CKD P ORDER AND CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON SACRAMENTO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 22, 2017 defendant Bodenhamer filed a motion for summary 20 judgment. On January 24, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- 21 opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. In the same order, plaintiff was informed 22 that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 23 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 24 responded to the court’s order. 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: March 6, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 vale1814.46fr 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
