(PC) Davenport v. Gomez et al., No. 2:2016cv01739 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/21/2018 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's claims concerning eye care in April of 2015 and thereafter are DISMISSED without prejudice.(Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Davenport v. Gomez et al. Doc. 17 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JAMES DAVENPORT, 6 7 8 No. 2:16-cv-1739 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SGT. GOMEZ, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On January 18, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 15 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 16 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 17 objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 18, 2018, are adopted in full; and 22 2. Plaintiff’s claims concerning eye care in April of 2015 and thereafter are dismissed 23 without prejudice. 24 DATED: February 21, 2018 25 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
