(PC) Fordley v. Lizarraga, et al., No. 2:2016cv01387 - Document 48 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2017 ADOPTING 37 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 32 and 33 Motions for a continuance. (York, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Fordley v. Lizarraga, et al. Doc. 48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN F. FORDLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1387-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER LIZARRAGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 4, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations.1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1 Plaintiff did however, file additional motions for 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2017, are adopted in full; and 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a continuance (ECF Nos. 32, 33) is denied. 3 DATED: 12/19/2017 4 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
