(HC) Maling v. Johnson et al, No. 2:2016cv01263 - Document 36 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2017 ADOPTING 32 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYNG 31 Motion to Make Additional Findings and Amend the Judgment. (York, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Maling v. Johnson et al Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EZRA DAVID GIPAN MALING, 11 12 13 No. 2:16-cv-1263-JAM-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 Petitioner brought this action for writ of habeas corpus seeking release from immigration 17 detention. The petition was denied and judgment was entered accordingly on July 17, 2017. ECF 18 Nos. 29, 30. On July 31, 2017, petitioner filed a “Motion to Make Additional Findings and 19 Amend the Judgment.” ECF No. 31. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 5, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 5, 2017, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Petitioner’s July 31, 2017 “Motion to Make Additional Findings and Amend the 4 Judgment” (ECF No. 31) is DENIED. 5 DATED: 12/19/2017 6 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.