(PC) Haney v. Johnson et al, No. 2:2016cv01173 - Document 39 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/2018 ADOPTING 37 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 28 Motion to Require Plaintiff to Post a Security. Defendants shall file a response to the complaint within 30 days of the date this Order is filed. (York, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Haney v. Johnson et al Doc. 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONTE L. HANEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-01173-TLN-KJN v. ORDER S. JOHNSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 19, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 37.) 23 Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 38.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to require Plaintiff to post a security (ECF No. 28) is denied; 4 3. Defendants shall file a response to the complaint within thirty days of the date this 5 Order is filed. 6 7 Dated: March 16, 2018 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.