(PC) Rubidoux v. Macomber et al, No. 2:2016cv01033 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/28/17: The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2017 16 , are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 2 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rubidoux v. Macomber et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNON REBIDOUX, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-CV-1033-MCE-CMK-P v. ORDER J. MACOMBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District 19 of California local rules. 20 On March 8, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a 22 specified time. ECF No. 16. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 23 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2017 (ECF No. 16), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 28, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
