(PS) Frances v. Accessible Space, Inc. et al, No. 2:2016cv01016 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/30/2018 ADOPTING 37 Findings and Recommendations; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with the exception of plaintiff's 42U.S.C. section 2000a claim which is DISMISSED; Defendants shall file an Answer to plaintiffs Complaint within 30 days of the filing of this Order. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
(PS) Frances v. Accessible Space, Inc. et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGELICA FRANCES, 12 No. 2:16-cv-1016-JAM-GGH Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ACCESSIBLE SPACE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff appears in this personal injury action pro se and in forma pauperis. On April 30, 17 18 2018 the magistrate judge to whom the matter was assigned issued Findings and 19 Recommendations recommending that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be DENIED with the 20 exception of the 42 U.S.C. section 2000a claim and allowing plaintiff an opportunity to amend 21 that claim if she indicated that intent in any objections she filed to the magistrate judges 22 Recommendations. ECF No. 37. The parties were given twenty-one (21) days to file any 23 objections to the foregoing. Id. No party has filed objections. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, 24 25 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file and the 26 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations the court ADOPTS the findings and 27 recommendations in full. 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with the exception of plaintiff’s 42U.S.C. section 2000a claim which is DISMISSED; 2. Defendants shall file an Answer to plaintiff’s Complaint within 30 days of the filing of this Order. 6 7 8 9 DATED: May 30, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.