(PS) Haworth v. Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District, No. 2:2016cv00998 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/8/16 recommending that re 1 Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice; Referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Washington, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Haworth v. Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERI LEE HAWORTH, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 No. 2:16-cv-00998 JAM GGH: Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION FAIRFIELD-SUISUN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 12, 2016 the court issued an Order granting Plaintiff permission to proceed in 21 forma pauperis, but dismissing her Complaint with 30 days leave to Amend. ECF No. 3. No 22 Amended Complaint has been filed. 23 24 25 26 CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in the previous order, ECF # 3 (finding lack of subject matter jurisdiction), the undersigned recommends that the case be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 737(b)(1). Within thirty (30) days 28 after service of this Order plaintiff may file written objections. Such a document should be 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is 2 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive her right to appeal the 3 District Court’s Order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: December 8, 2016 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
