(PC) Daniels v. Arnold, No. 2:2016cv00551 - Document 82 (E.D. Cal. 2024)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/24 ADOPTING in full 78 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 63 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's 72 motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. Judgment shall be entered in defendant's favor. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Daniels v. Arnold Doc. 82 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TED DARNELL DANIELS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-00551 KJM AC P v. ORDER ERIC ARNOLD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 3, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After receiving an 23 extension of time (ECF No. 80), plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and 24 recommendations (ECF No. 81). 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 27 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2023 (ECF No. 78), are adopted 3 in full; 4 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63) is granted; 5 3. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 72) is denied; 6 4. Judgment shall be entered in defendant’s favor; and 7 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 8 DATED: March 27, 2024. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.