(PC) Sekona v. Custino, et al., No. 2:2016cv00517 - Document 117 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/17/19 ADOPTING 98 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 84 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Sekona v. Custino, et al. Doc. 117 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P v. ORDER F. CUSTINO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. On January 17, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and 23 recommendations have been filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 17, 2019, are adopted in 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 85) is denied. 3 4 full; and 5 6 7 8 DATED: May 17, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
