(PC) Bivins v. Ju et al, No. 2:2016cv00389 - Document 50 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 48 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 07/17/18 GRANTING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSING Dr. Jeu/Ju without prejudice. Within 30 days, plaintiff may file an amended complaint against Dr. Borges. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Bivins v. Ju et al Doc. 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH BIVINS, 12 No. 2:16-cv-00389 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 DR. JEU, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 14, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 14, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38) is granted; 4 3. Dr. Jeu is dismissed from this action without prejudice; and 5 4. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint 6 7 8 against Dr. Borges. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 17, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
