(PC) Wilson v. Fox et al, No. 2:2016cv00219 - Document 32 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18. All of plaintiff's claims against defendants Fox, Collins, Bick, Ditomas, and Jenden and his § 1985 and § 1986 claims against defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Within 21 days of the filing of this order, defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders shall respond to the first amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Wilson v. Fox et al Doc. 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED WILSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0219 JAM AC P v. ORDER ROBERT FOX, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 11, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 30. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 11, 2018 (ECF No. 30), are adopted 27 28 in full; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. All of plaintiff’s claims against defendants Fox, Collins, Bick, Ditomas, and Jenden 2 and his § 1985 and § 1986 claims against defendants Saukhla, Osman, and Sanders are dismissed 3 without leave to amend. 4 3. Within twenty-one days of the filing of this order, defendants Saukhla, Osman, and 5 Sanders shall respond to the first amended complaint, as set forth in Section III.A of the January 6 11, 2018 screening order. 7 8 9 DATED: April 11, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wils0219.801 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
