(PS) Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate et al, No. 2:2015cv02448 - Document 92 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/7/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 74 Findings and Recommendations, with the addition that defenses 7, 8, 11, 17, 19, 22 and 24 are also inoperative due to defendant's stipulation that they could be stricken. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL GONZALEZ., 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-2448 GEB GGH Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL ESTATE et.al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 7, 2017 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days after service of the 23 findings and recommendations. ECF No. 74. On June 23, 2017 plaintiff requested a 15 day 24 extension of time to file Objections the foregoing, ECF No. 75, and on June 29, 2017 the 25 magistrate judge granted the request and issued an Order that required objections to be filed by 26 July 14, 2017. ECF 76. Plaintiff filed objections on July 21, 2017. ECF No. 82. 27 28 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis with a single exception. The 1 1 magistrate judge ordered that defendant’s defenses 1 and 3 were to be stricken in response to a 2 Motion to Strike, but failed to note that defendant had stipulated that defenses 7, 8, 11, 17, 19, 22 3 and 24 could also be stricken. . 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 7, 2017 are adopted in full with the 6 addition that defenses 7, 8, 11, 17, 19, 22 and 24 are also inoperative due to defendant’s 7 stipulation that they could be stricken. 8 Dated: September 7, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.